Игроки всегда ценят удобный и стабильный доступ к играм. Для этого идеально подходит зеркало Вавады, которое позволяет обходить любые ограничения, обеспечивая доступ ко всем бонусам и слотам.

The Risks of Social Media

social media twitter

For our October 2009 issue of Risk Management magazine, I wrote a cover story on the risks of social media. We called it “The New Wild West” given the lawless (or at least “precedent-less”) nature that today’s online world shares with the days of Jesse James and Billy the Kid.

Our main goal was to introduce the topic of social media — and all of its many risks — to an audience that may not be as familiar with this emerging threat as it should be. Companies and risk managers are always racing to keep up with the latest tech risks, but preventing viruses and securing databases is generally a responsibility for IT. Well, even though social media exists in the digital domain, many of its risks are old-world issues. There are real compliance, legal, reputational, privacy and intellectual property concerns in addition to all the IT exposures.

In the weeks and months to come, we will be taking an in-depth look at each of these issues individually in our Risks of Social Media post series, but, to kick things off, I just want to punctuate the key takeaway from what I wrote in October.

“Employers are going to be held liable for the behavior of their employees,” said Simonson. “Is harassment going on in social media? Breach of proprietary information? Employees can easily leak trade secrets.”

These things are not new risks, per se, but it is now much easier for one foolish error by an employee to become a significant issue. Once an employee hits the “reply” or “post” button, the information is now public and, because it is digital, it is essentially engraved in stone on a server somewhere.

“Users are becoming their own unedited publishers,” said Simonson. “I don’t think the risks are all that different from the past. There’s just a much greater chance for it. In the past, controlling all published material was easy.”

As always, what your company does can hurt you. And that includes all the individual actions of all your employees. Now, many of those actions just happen to occur outside of the physical world — and they occur instanteously and with less forethought than ever before, which makes them inherently more difficult to manage.

But you can do it. First, you just need to understand exactly what these risks are.

In addition to reading my aforementioned article, I encourage you to watch the video below from a panel discussion I recently participated in. (I’m the bald guy with the beard.) We gave a 90-minute presentation for an event hosted by the International Association of Business Communicators (IABC), and the clip is a 10-minute “best of” video that offers some nice insights into (1) monetizing opportunities, (2) restricting employee access to social networking sites, (3) who should “own” social media, (4) the legal risks of social media, and (5) “going viral.”

You can listen to the 30-minute, audio version at the IABC Philadelphia website as well.

And, most importantly, be sure to check back here regularly to read more from our Risks of Social Media series. (In the meantime, you can also see some of our previous social media coverage here.)

For more on social media generally and how it is transforming how we interact with one another and distribute information, watch this video.

State Farm Enters the Toyota Fiasco

The hits just keep on coming for Toyota.

online pharmacy neurontin with best prices today in the USA

On the heels of a $16 million government fine and the potential for billions of dollars in loses after pending litigation shakes out, State Farm has asked Toyota to pay them back for any claims related to the unintended acceleration fiasco. Other insurers, including Allstate, are expected to follow suit and Mark Bunim, an attorney with the mediation firm Closed Case, says these subrogation demands could eventually end up costing Toyota up to $30 million. But the ultimate determination will take some time.

“Someone has to go through each and every auto claim, and then try to make a determination if it involved unwarranted acceleration,” Bunim says. “It could take months.”

This is not the first time State Farm has been at the forefront of action regarding Toyota. Back in 2007, State Farm warned the automaker and the NHTSA about an increase in unintended acceleration reports involving Toyota vehicles. While this warning adds further fuel to the argument that both Toyota and regulators were asleep at the switch, Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood pointed out on his blog that the NHTSA was looking into the problem as early as 2003.

The point is that our safety officials have been looking at this issue from all angles for quite some time.

So the idea that NHTSA is in the business of ignoring information–valuable or otherwise–from automobile insurers, safety organizations, or consumers is just plain wrong.

online pharmacy rifadin with best prices today in the USA

Of course, this still doesn’t answer why it took them six years to act. Perhaps they were just being diligent.

online pharmacy female cialis with best prices today in the USA

America’s Most Trustworthy Companies

trust

For the fourth straight year, Forbes has unveiled its list of America’s 100 Most Trustworthy Companies and, as Reactions pointed out, three property/casualty insurers not only made the cut, but received perfect scores: Montpelier Re, Greenlight Capital and National Interstate.

The other insurance firms in the top 100 were: Chubb, Arch, Renaissance Re, Transatlantic, FPIC, Safety Insurance Group, EMC and Navigators. Here is the full list, which includes Bed, Bath & Beyond, Hess and Lowe’s in the “large cap” division.

For the rankings, Forbes partners with Audit Integrity, and in the write up, they were quick to kick another insurance giant while it is down in an attempt to show how their past predictions have proven true.

Audit Integrity looks beyond the raw data on companies’ income statements and balance sheets to assess the true quality of corporate accounting and management practices. As early as August 2005, Audit Integrity’s proprietary rating system signaled potential problems at Lehman Brothers. In December of 2005 it gave American International Group a significant downgrade.

Awww. Poor AIG. Always getting made fun of for helping tank the economy.

They also note some of the rationale behind the list, which is directly in line with a core tenant of risk mitigation: avoid negative events.

Audit Integrity’s evaluation penalizes companies for unusual or excessive executive compensation, high levels of management turnover, substantial insider trading relative to their corporate peers or high levels of short-term executive compensation, which encourages management to focus on short-term results. Good housekeeping practices leave companies better prepared to handle an economic downturn, especially one as severe as right now. The absence of negative events counts, as much as the existence of positive events, in getting businesses on the list. “These companies have made it through our screening process and shown consistent high quality,” Zwingli says. “Healthy individuals are often that way because they don’t engage in unhealthy behavior. These companies are the same way.”

What’s the saying?

“All news is good news.”

Yeah, I don’t think that is true for companies. And apparently, neither do Audit Integrity and Forbes.

In related news, Greenwich Associates recently released its “Excellence Awards for Middle Market Insurance Brokerage.”

Bad News Mounts for Massey

It seems Massey Energy Co., the owner of the West Virginia mine where 25 people died in an explosion, made one bad decision after another in the time leading up to last week’s tragic event.

First, the company opted out of buying a little something called insurance — more specifically, business interruption insurance. Massey’s annual report acknowledged that its operations are subject to certain conditions and risks that may cause an interruption in operations, but that they “do not currently carry business interruption insurance.” The company must now deal with lost production (the mine is still closed) and the enormous workers compensation liability hanging over its head, not to mention the lawsuits Massey is sure to face. These glaring troubles have caused the company’s stock price to slip from its 52-week high of $54.80 on April 5th to this morning’s share price of $47.33, a 13.6% decrease.

Second are the decisions made by Don Blankenship, Massey’s CEO. His greed, hatred of regulators and unions, and mocking of environmentalists have been heavily broadcast throughout the media since the deadly April 5 event. The Kansas City Star ran a scathing editorial on the coal czar, highlighting the numerous fines levied on Blankenship’s various mines, his successful ousting of a West Virginia state Supreme Court Judge (which eventually saved Massey from a $50 million jury verdict) and his constant concern for profit over safety.

In the world of coal mines, Massey had a below average safety record, to put it nicely.

As the New York Times stated Tuesday:

J. Davitt McAteer, a former assistant director of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, said the Massey company “is certainly one of the worst in the industry” when it came to safety and called recent violations at the mine for substandard ventilation and other problems “cardinal sins.” “The Massey record is without doubt one of the most difficult in the industry from a safety standpoint,” Mr. McAteer, now the vice president of Wheeling Jesuit University, said in an interview. He said other large, diversified coal operators had far better safety records than Massey.

That same article reports that, in 2009, the mine registered an unfathomable 458 violations, many of them regarding safety requirements. But for Blankenship, safety came last, profit came first, as noted in the Massey CEO’s now-infamous memo to his deep mine superintendents.

It states:

If you have been asked by your group presidents, supervisors, engineers, to do anything else other than to run coal (i.e. – build overcasts, do construction jobs, or whatever) you need to ignore them and run coal. This memo is necessary only because we seem not to understand that the coal pays the bills.

The running of coal does pay the bills, but only when you operate a mine safe enough to keep workers alive. The “overcasts” that he refers to are necessary for proper mine ventilation.

The families and friends of the victims are rightfully pissed off at Mr. Blankenship. When he arrived at the mine to announce the death toll to those gathered there, shouting ensued — blaming the Massey CEO for caring more about profits than miners’ lives. Don Blankenship, in his efforts to increase profits at all costs, has instead almost halted his company’s revenue stream and severely scarred its reputation along with his own.

Was it worth it, Don?

coal miner

J. Davitt McAteer, a former assistant director of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, said the Massey company “is certainly one of the worst in the industry” when it came to safety and called recent violations at the mine for substandard ventilation and other problems “cardinal sins.”
“The Massey record is without doubt one of the most difficult in the industry from a safety standpoint,” Mr. McAteer, now the vice president of Wheeling Jesuit University, said in an interview. He said other large, diversified coal operators had far better safety records than Massey.

Prioritizing profits over safety at Massey may have led to tragedy.