Игроки всегда ценят удобный и стабильный доступ к играм. Для этого идеально подходит зеркало Вавады, которое позволяет обходить любые ограничения, обеспечивая доступ ко всем бонусам и слотам.

Former NSA Director Talks Cybersecurity, Insurance at Advisen Conference

NEW YORK—Advisen’s Cyber Risk Insights Conference, held during Cyber Week, featured risk management professionals and more than 18 panels and sessions on Oct. 25. The keynote was delivered by Adm.

buy apixaban online achievephysiorehab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/apixaban.html no prescription pharmacy

Michael S. Rogers, former Navy commander of U.S. Cyber Command and Director of the National Security Agency (NSA), under the administrations of  Presidents Obama and Trump. Rogers discussed rising cyber threats and offered advice to providers and consumers as they assess their cyber insurance policies.

“For insurers, you need to be prepared, because the list of actors is growing and the threat is growing,” Rogers said. “Don’t build on a strategy [where you believe] things are getting better.”

He also put a particular spotlight on the fact that there is no universally accepted guideline for cyber threats when considering acts of war. Cyber, he said, differs from traditional triggers because there’s typically no physical injury or loss of life.

“You have these wholly different international views, because nation-states in western democracies do not have ownership of the web,” he said. “They do not control their citizens and control the flow of data,” as opposed to countries with greater control of information.

buy bactroban online achievephysiorehab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/bactroban.html no prescription pharmacy

“Because you have these broad, polar views it’s been difficult at times, on an international level, to get a consensus on what a framework be like to set a cybersecurity standard,” which Rogers added, could help define how a cyber attack might be considered an act of warfare.

buy strattera online achievephysiorehab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/strattera.html no prescription pharmacy

He proposed an approach that could start nations on a path to a universally accepted guideline: “Can get we get a smaller subset of issues to coalesce around a core group of principles, start small, and build from there? I think we’ll have success that way.”

Rogers noted that he is a proponent and believes incentivization may be the key to keeping businesses safer and maintaining lower premiums, using features of the automotive industry as an example.

“Automatic brakes and safer vehicles, for example, were an incentive for the buyer and the seller,” he said. “Production and consumption were all incentivized to make better decisions. I don’t know if it will work [with cyber insurance]. It’s all about risk.”

Rogers’ insight dovetailed along with the new information from the eighth annual Advisen cyber survey that Zurich Insurance released at the opening of the conference.

The percentage of companies that purchase cyber insurance, either via stand-alone policies or endorsements, has increased 40 points since 2011. This year’s results show a 10% increase from 2017, the largest year-over-year increase since its inception.

“Cyberrisks continue to change and businesses continue to look for ways to protect themselves from those risks,” said Paul Horgan, head of North America Commercial Insurance for Zurich North America. “These survey results provide a critical snapshot of the attitudes, concerns and actions of risk managers. It is our responsibility to respond to their needs and concerns with innovative services and solutions.”

Survey results show the two most influential factors driving cyber insurance purchases in the past year:

  • regulatory changes such as the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and
  • business continuity risks such as the Dyn distributed denial of servicer (DDoS) attack, WannaCry and NotPetya events. These caused significant losses to businesses around the world, shutting down network systems and in many cases slowing or actually halting business operations.

The Advisen data reflects a stark contrast to the feedback from last year’s survey, which found that just 10% of respondents identified business interruption as the primary reason for purchasing cyber insurance and that purchase growth had gone stagnant after a steady six-year increase from 35% to 65%.

These factors were two of the top emerging cyberrisks identified by Risk Management magazine in early 2018.

RIMS Report: Establishing and Communicating ERM

Recent trends indicate that management is being consulted more than ever by executives and boards who are looking for information that can aid in decision making. This has moved the value of enterprise risk management (ERM) to the forefront, to give the board an overall view of the risks the company faces.

A report just released by RIMS, Risk Communication to the C-Suite and Board of Directors: Visualizing Enterprise Risk Management Information, explores ERM and offers risk managers strategies to use to determine what they report to decision-makers.

According to the report:

“Without robust information about risk, directors cannot offer effective oversight. Therefore, management should carefully evaluate the format and purpose of board risk communication with consideration to risk governance responsibilities, risk appetite, and the intersection between risk and strategy. This process also ensures that the risk information is of value to the management team as well and not simply ‘paperwork.’”

In order to be proactive, boards have expressed the need for specific information, the authors noted, but with “understanding of risks” and “oversight of risk management” cited as the most important areas for board improvement, “risk managers need to be strategic in the way they disseminate information. What you pass along should be presented carefully so that an executive can easily understand and prepare to translate for stakeholders.”

The professional report highlights information from the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), the most recent COSO ERM Framework, and the Corporate Executive Board (now Gartner). Backed by that data, the authors discuss where ERM stands today and, by offering various engagement models and maps, provide suggestions and options for determining:

  • Which executives should receive the information.
  • How to craft the message.
  • Delivery methods.
  • Additional sources of key risk management information.

“In developing a system for delivering key risk information to the board, it must be stated that ERM is not a prescribed science,” the authors wrote. “No two organizations will have the same approach or process for determining what defines key risk information or how it should be delivered.”

The report is co-authored by Julie Cain, senior strategic advisor, information and technology risk management at the Educational Testing Service; Christine Novotny, ARM, RIMS-CRMP, manager risk and insurance for PeaceHealth; and David J. Young, lecturer at the Risk Management and Insurance Program, University of Colorado Denver Business School. The group also presented on this topic at RIMS 2018 Annual Conference & Exhibition in San Antonio.

Risk Communication to the C-Suite and Board of Directors: Visualizing Enterprise Risk Management Information is available to RIMS members only for the first 60 days. After the introductory period, it will become available to the broader risk management community. You can download the report via Risk Knowledge.

Enterprise Risk Management’s Wakeup Call: 10 Years After is also available on Risk Knowledge. Complementary to Risk Communication to the C-Suite, it discusses the importance of integrating ERM into companies’ frameworks as they prepare for the possibility of another financial crisis or a new threat. Read more about the report here.

Total Cost of Risk Drops for Fourth Straight Year, RIMS Finds

The risk management profession is proving its resiliency. Even in the face of major hurricanes, technological influence and the seemingly common threat of international trade wars, 2017 saw the total cost of risk (TCOR) decline for the fourth consecutive year, according to the 2018 RIMS Benchmark Survey, which was jointly published by RIMS and Advisen.

Despite these uncertainties, the TCOR per $1,000 of revenue continued to drop, the survey revealed, ending at $9.75 in 2017. The main drivers were declines in liability costs (8%), by decreases in property, liability, workers compensation, management liability, and professional liability costs, as well as overall risk management administration costs. TCOR is defined in the survey as the cost of insurance, plus the costs of the losses retained and the administrative costs of the risk management department.

The survey encompassed industry data from 590 organizations and contains policy-level information from 10 coverage groups, subdivided into 90 lines of business.

Advisen Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer David Bradford said market conditions are favorable for insurance buyers. “A competitive insurance market resulting from a chronic overabundance of risk capital strongly contributed to TCOR decreasing steadily since 2013,” he said. “Not even record catastrophe losses in 2017 could derail the downward trend.”

Key findings from this year’s RIMS Benchmark Survey include:

  • TCOR fell despite record-high natural catastrophe losses such as hurricanes Maria, Irma and Harvey, as well as wildfires and mudslides in California.
  • While TCOR per $1,000 of revenue fell for most industries, four—healthcare, government & nonprofit, information technology and consumer staples—saw rising TCOR in 2017.
  • As predicted in the 2017 survey, the percentage of companies buying cyber insurance continued its increase since 2011, ending at 65% in 2017.
  • In 2017, the percentage of companies buying cyber insurance increased to 65%. This trend has continued upward since 2011. Additionally, the cost of cyber insurance per $1,000 of revenue increased 33% from 2016.
  • The adoption of new technologies such as machine learning and blockchain, political instability in several parts of the world, globalization, terrorism and cyber threats are expected to further shape the risk landscape in 2018 and beyond.

Bradford noted that the traditional insurance pricing cycle may seem broken, but that term is more likely a new normal resulting from a more efficient insurance market. “The factors contributing to this more efficient market are varied and complex, but the upshot is that a hard market like that last seen in 2001-2002, when commercial insurance rates shot up 50 percent, may simply never occur again,” he said. “Prices may rise, but most likely they will be quickly beaten down by fresh capital flowing into the market. That is good news for risk managers.”

“As the tools, resources and technologies that facilitate the exchange of ideas and experiences continue to improve, risk management professionals have become better equipped to strengthen their risk financing programs and apply cutting-edge, cost-cutting strategies,” said RIMS CEO Mary Roth. “The year-over-year data available in the RIMS Benchmark Survey allows professionals to accurately set expectations, and achieve goals while designing competitive but fair insurance programs for their organizations.”

To order a copy of the 2018 RIMS Benchmark Survey, visit www.advisenltd.com/media/reports/rims-benchmark-survey/ or www.RIMS.org/book.

The Data Analytics Adventure

Is your audience changing? Are your products still relevant and addressing customers’ needs? Are there opportunities for organization to predict—or least make an informed guess—about the future of the market or other trends? Answers to these difficult questions are often buried in the overwhelming amount of data organizations are already collecting and storing.

In this digital age, data analytics is a hot topic for businesses and their risk professionals. In fact, nearly half of the survey respondents (46%) from the RIMS MARSH Excellence in Risk Management XV survey agreed that to successfully become digital, using data and analytics to unlock value and make decisions faster was critical.

Where to begin?
Gathering, organizing and understanding data can be such a daunting task that many often choose to put it off for “another day.

buy minocin online orthosummit.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/minocin.html no prescription pharmacy

Paul Koziatek, Enterprise Risk Manager for Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC and an upcoming presenter for the RIMS’ Aug. 2 webinar titled “Mother Lode—Driving Results from Your Data Analytics” offered strategies for risk professionals to get their hands dirty and embark on this data-crunching adventure.

Before getting started, risk professionals must realize that data analytics is an ongoing process, not a project. “One of the biggest misconceptions is that it is a one-off deal,” he said. “It’s the complete opposite. Data analytics is a living, breathing adventure. If you go in with a project-like mindset, you’ll be doomed from the start.”

A great advantage risk professionals have today is the software available to them. “There are a lot of risk professionals who are under the impression that data analytics software is expensive. That might have been the case several years ago, but now RMIS systems can be tailored to meet specific needs and purchased in pieces.”

Additionally, he notes that data analytics programs must constantly be reevaluated.  As information begins to trickle in, risk professionals might have to take a closer look at what they are requesting. “Risk professionals should examine and maintain the program frequently because the original variables used to obtain the data might not always produce the same outcomes.”

Engaging co-workers
A data analytics program requires information and clarification from various subject matter experts from a range of business units. To build these relationships, risk professionals need support from leadership to ensure others in the organization are committed to the process and aware of leadership’s expectations.

With that support, risk professionals can overcome a lack of urgency from others in the organization. “There is a potential to hear feedback such as ‘There is not enough time,’ or ‘We’ll get to that later.’ It is the risk professional’s job to help department leaders see that risk management can create value and is not just a cost-center,” Koziatek said. “Consider those experts as tools and resources. They are going to be the ones who pull the data and provide what it is you need.

buy cipro online orthosummit.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/cipro.html no prescription pharmacy

The ability to explain to those experts exactly what you need to get the job done is important. If that’s not accomplished, you can wind up with a bunch of usable or corrupt data.”

He added, “Sales, marketing and planning teams are a great place to start. In some organizations already have the tools, packages and software risk professionals need to analyze data.”

Quick Wins
Quick wins will be a bit different for every organization. Many data analytic adventures get started because of a legacy of bad workers’ compensation cases or a rash of claims against the organization. “For some, a quick win might be focusing the program on a hot, troublesome and expensive activity to quickly reduce the cost of the risk. Key to determining what might constitute a quick-win is understanding the business’s strategy. “Listen to the board of directors, to the CEO and CFO. Then tailor your analytics to that communication and help drive the company’s strategy,” Koziatek said.

Realizing the Value
Data analytics is like a treasure hunt.  With the right information, guidance and support, organizations and their risk professional can discover hidden potential, revenue streams, cost-saving measures and new opportunities.

More than figuring out where the weak points are for the organization, data analytics uncovers connections. “Data analytics is all about the correlation between different variables and outcomes.

buy cytotec online orthosummit.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/cytotec.html no prescription pharmacy

It offers great value by allowing risk professionals to identify those variables before it’s too late,” Koziatek said.

He points to workers compensation and employee-related injuries as an example of data analytics at its best. His organization found that the frequency of injuries and claims were highest among short-term employees (two years or less). Thus, the correlation between claims, length of employment and training were quickly realized. “Without data analytics it might take an organization much longer to really identify the root cause of the activity and, as time goes by, more money can be lost.”

Data analytics’ greatest value for the risk professional is its ability to justify and gain even more support for risk management initiatives. “There is nothing more important than having the data to back up my solutions, my ideas and my needs. That is what the board, senior executives and business leaders want to see. Without these analytics, their outcomes and the reports we produce as a result, it would be extremely difficult to ‘sell’ my ideas to leadership,” Koziatek concluded.