Игроки всегда ценят удобный и стабильный доступ к играм. Для этого идеально подходит зеркало Вавады, которое позволяет обходить любые ограничения, обеспечивая доступ ко всем бонусам и слотам.

Dip, Don’t Swipe: How the EMV Liability Shift Impacts Merchants

shutterstock_287890574

More than 575 million chip-cards have been issued by financial institutions to consumers, and you’ve probably been walking around with one in your pocket since June of last year. Since October 2015, merchants may have requested you begin to ‘dip’ rather than ‘swipe’ your card. Why? Although the transition to chip-card technology may be confusing at first, it’s ultimately a benefit to privacy and security.

For merchants, however, the transition to accepting chip-card technology is essential to avoiding what the industry is calling the EMV ‘liability shift.’

What is EMV?

EMV is a global standard for secure credit card transactions utilizing microchip technology embedded in debit and credit cards. The name derives from EuroPay, MasterCard and Visa (EMB), the companies that originally developed the technology.

Although Europe adopted the practice long ago, the United States was late in transitioning to the EMV technology standard.

By the end of 2015, 70% of U.S. credit cards were issued as EMV cards, but only 59% of retail locations were expected to be EMV-compliant.

What is the EMV “liability shift”?

As of Oct. 1, 2015 (2017 for fuel-pump stations), many card brands have instituted a “liability shift” policy to incentivize both merchants and card issuers (banks and credit unions) to transition to EMV technology, which has shown to increase card security and reduce counterfeit fraud. The liability shift means that between merchant and card issuers, liability for counterfeit card-present transactions resides with the party using the least secure EMV-related technology.

In other words, prior to Oct. 1, 2015, the liability for fraudulent transactions largely fell upon the card issuer. Now, non-EMV compliant merchants could be liable for the costs associated with any chargebacks.

What does EMV mean for merchants?

Consumers were provided their new chip-cards by card issuers, but what are the next steps for merchants? Although 78,000 merchants have already installed EMV chip-activated technology, tens of thousands are still risking exorbitant costs due to fraudulent charges and the ‘liability shift.’

The average cost of an EMV-compliant point-of-sale terminal is around $500. Chip-reading mobile devices such as Square can be purchased for $29-$39. While the initial costs of EMV technology may appear large for some merchants, ultimately merchants will pay far less than the potential fines, penalties and assessments levied by major card brands against non-compliant merchants.

Under Visa’s Global Compromised Account Recovery process (GCAR), for example, Visa can levy an assessment against a non-PCI compliant merchant that suffers a breach, that includes fraud recovery (an amount to reimburse issuing banks for fraud perpetrated on cards subject to a data breach) and operating expense recovery amounts (such as an amount to reimburse issuing banks for the costs to reissue payment cards subject to a data breach). The contractual clauses governing this exposure are generally found in the Merchant Services Agreement (MSA). This portion of a merchant’s exposure is insurable, but not all cyber liability policies respond the same way. It is important to note any breach of contract exclusions or sub-limits pertaining to both PCI Fines/Penalties and PCI Assessments.

Mitigate the risk

The first step to mitigating the risk is to become EMV compliant. While each of the card brand’s EMV-compliance certification program may vary, in general, merchants must apply for and receive certification through its acquiring bank to become EMV-compliant, which entails three phases:

  • Hardware Certification: installing EMV-enabled terminals that are certified by EMVCo to process payments.
  • Software Certification: implementing payment application software.
  • End-to-end Certification: holistic testing and approval of point-of-sale configuration, where the card brands check and confirm the integrity of the payment chain as a whole.

The certification process and level of involvement will vary across merchants, depending largely upon the size and complexity of the merchant’s business; the timeframe to completion can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months.

Top Board and C-Suite Risks for 2016

Regulatory changes, economic conditions and cyberthreats are the top concerns of board members and company executives this year, according to a new enterprise risk management survey.

U.S.-based companies listed several operational risks as top concerns, while non-U.S. companies listed only one, cyberthreat, as a major concern, according to the report, Executive Perspectives on Top Risks for 2016, by North Carolina State’s ERM Initiative and Protiviti.

Overall, companies see the current business environment as riskier than in 2015, but not as risky as 2014.

buy flexeril online cphia2023.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/jpg/flexeril.html no prescription pharmacy

With increased inquiries and added concerns about risk from boards of directors and company executives, respondents indicated they will be investing more in risk management this year. “More organizations are realizing that additional risk management sophistication is warranted given the fast pace in which complex risks are emerging,” the study found.

Boards of directors rated only one strategic risk among their top five concerns, with the remaining falling into macroeconomic and operational risk categories.

buy zofran online cphia2023.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/jpg/zofran.html no prescription pharmacy

CEOs, on the other hand, saw strategic risks as three out of their top five issues.

buy elavil online cphia2023.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/jpg/elavil.html no prescription pharmacy

According to the study:

“This disparity in the viewpoints emphasizes the critical importance of both the board and management team engaging in risk discussions, given their unique perspectives may be contributing to an apparent lack of consensus about the organization’s most significant emerging risks.”

ERM Risks

A Trump Presidency Poses Top Risk to Global Economy

According to the Economist Intelligence Unit, a Donald Trump presidency poses one of the greatest current global risks. Indeed, Trump ranks as the sixth overall potential risk to the global economy, and based on a 25-point scale, the research firm rated the risk approximately equal to the rising threat of jihadi terrorism destabilizing the global economy.

The EIU, research and analysis sister company to the Economist, ranks risks based on both impact and probability, with a Trump presidency presenting considerable potential impact, but moderate probability. The EIU’s assessment focused in particular on Trump’s hostility toward free trade (most notably NAFTA), aggressive rhetoric on China, and “exceptionally right-wing stance” on the Middle East and jihadi terrorism.

online pharmacy neurontin with best prices today in the USA

“In the event of a Trump victory, his hostile attitude to free trade, and alienation of Mexico and China in particular, could escalate rapidly into a trade war—and at the least scupper the Trans-Pacific Partnership between the US and 11 other American and Asian states signed in February 2016,” EIU analysts wrote. “His militaristic tendencies towards the Middle East (and ban on all Muslim travel to the U.S.) would be a potent recruitment tool for jihadi groups, increasing their threat both within the region and beyond.”

The firm concluded with a prediction that, while it believes Trump will most likely lose to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, that probability could change in the event of a terrorist attack on U.S. soil or a sudden economic downturn.

In such a scenario, the trickle-down effect within the American political machine poses noteworthy risk as well.

“Innate hostility within the Republican hierarchy towards Mr. Trump, combined with the inevitable virulent Democratic opposition, will see many of his more radical policies blocked in Congress,” the report says.

online pharmacy antabuse with best prices today in the USA

But “such internal bickering will also undermine the coherence of domestic and foreign policymaking.”

The firm’s overall top 10 risks by point ranking are:

economist intelligence unit top global economy risks

Brussels Bombings Highlight New Risk Realities

Belgium map
The deadly terrorist bombings in Brussels this week have elicited an outpouring of support for the victims and for Belgium, along with renewed rage and consternation regarding ISIS. These are predictable reactions.

What these acts also elicited, I’ve noticed, are numerous comments from many outlets that the attacks were not surprising.

The BBC, in fact, said the bombings were “not a surprise” and security experts chimed in with similar assessments. Even Belgians themselves admit that the attack wasn’t shocking—Prime Minister, Charles Michel, lamented that “what we feared, has happened.” Think about how much has changed in less than a generation. Now, when the capital of the EU and NATO becomes a war zone, many react as though this is business as usual.

When it comes to political violence and warfare, we (or at least Western Europe) are living in a brave new world.

In fact, research I’ve conducted in recent weeks for a RIMS Executive Report on political risk confirms how much the paradigm has changed. Political risk experts I interviewed have been emphasizing this point. “I think it is truly a distinctive point in world affairs,” said one. Another confessed, “I’ve been doing this for nearly 20 years, and this is by far the most unstable, tenuous, deteriorating…risk environment I’ve ever seen.”

These sentiments are based on more than ISIS. Recent developments include the Ukraine civil war, the migrant crisis, deterioration of large swaths of the Middle East, tensions in the South China Sea, a weakening Chinese economy and Brazil’s political crisis. All contribute to a consensus that things are changing.

For the risk community, a big change is formerly reliable standards of which parts of the world are stable and which are unstable, such as developed economies versus developing and first-world versus second- and third-world. Now more than ever, risk managers considering the security of global operations need to examine a country’s vital signs rather than rely on conventional wisdom about stability. And if mass-casualty terror attacks are the new normal for Western Europe, a number of risk professionals will need to become better acquainted with the realities of political violence.

To end on a positive note, however, we do not have to believe the sky is falling. While terrorist attacks are brutal and unfortunate, it is consoling to think about the odds of being a victim. As data nerds are happy to point out, a person is much more likely to meet his or her demise from bathtubs, dogs and food poisoning. The Post has reported that you are more likely to be crushed by furniture than snuffed out by ISIS.