Climate Change Report Causes Alarm

New findings on climate change, establishing it as a manmade phenomenon, are garnering attention from the insurance industry, which recommends immediate action.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) newest report  “clarifies what businesses and investors already know, that climate change is happening now and human activity is the dominant reason why,” Mindy Lubber, president of CERES, a nonprofit organization that works with insurers and investors said recently on a conference call. “Climate change is disrupting all aspects of our global economy, including supply chains, commodity markets and the entire insurance industry, which is seeing exponentially large losses from extreme weather events.”

Lara Mowery, managing director, head of global property specialty practice with Guy Carpenter & Co., noted that the report should cause “significant concern” and impact how insurers and reinsurers shape their business going forward.

Insurers’ and reinsurers’ business plans “depend critically on understanding and assessing risk, which is likely to become even more challenging as weather variability increases,” she said. Identifying and understanding the causes and consequences of climate change is essential to “implementing workable risk management solutions.”

Global cat losses are increasing, she explained. In the 1980s, “the rolling 10-year annual average for the worldwide cat loss was less than $10 billion. In the last few years that average has jumped up to more than $50 billion average, based on that 10-year rolling time frame.” In addition, 2005, 2011 and 2012 represent the top three insured cat loss years on record, she noted.

Given the IPCC’s conclusion on flood, drought and changing weather patterns and evidence of this over the past 50 years, the industry needs to evaluate how these changes could impact future losses. As an example, she said, the most widespread hazard of global warming is coastal flooding. Impact of events such as Superstorm Sandy, which produced devastating storm surge, could have even worse consequences if sea levels continue to rise. “Insurers and reinsurers must continually assess the most up to date research and adjust their business plans according to increases in calculated loss.”

While this has meant more insurer capital is at risk, “that can’t be the only response, the only solution and the only answer. We can’t just keep putting more money in the path of what’s happening,” Mowery said.

She emphasized that the industry and insurance buyers can be taking steps now to address the risks.

A recent example of innovation in this area is the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (MTA) $200 million catastrophe bond that was issued in July, “the first of its kind to cover storm surge specifically,” she explained. The MTA commented in the aftermath of Sandy that their traditional avenues for insurance and reinsurance “constricted dramatically,” making it more difficult for them to obtain the kind of risk transfer they needed.

She also pointed out that “We can’t continue to let human and economic costs escalate. Building codes and standards and land use strategies are accepted adaptation measures to improve resilience against flood, wind and fire impacts that may worsen under global warming.”

FEMA Releases Premium Guidelines for “High-Risk” Flood Zones

Anton Oparin / Shutterstock.com

Insurers have historically used FEMA’s Specific Rating Guidelines to calculate premiums for properties at high risk of flooding, particularly those built with the lowest floor elevation below the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Prior to the National Flood Insurance Program’s extension in 2012 owners of these properties received subsidized rates well below the true flood risk. Many of these properties will now be rated using the Specific Rating Guidelines which FEMA released to the public last Wednesday.

The use of these new guidelines will undoubtedly result in significantly higher premium rates for many property owners in high risk zones. In its report FEMA stated that people whose properties are four feet below base flood elevation will see premiums totaling $95,000 over a 10-year period. These rates have many property owners and elected officials speaking out strongly against the reforms. Members of the Louisiana congressional delegation, including Senator Mary Landrieu (D), Rep. Bill Cassidy (R), and Rep. Cedric Richmond (D), have urged Congress to pass legislation that will delay or lower the rate increases. “I remain very concerned about the impacts these rate increases will have on homeowners and small businesses throughout our nation,” said Sen. Landrieu. Michael Hecht, president and CEO of Greater New Orleans, Inc., went every further stating that “flood insurance will be unaffordable for home and business owners across coastal and riverine America.”

In its guidelines FEMA did provide suggestions for property owners affected by the rate increases which include elevating the property above base flood level; however, this is often easier said than done. Flood insurance policies in the northeast offered an extra $30,000 to allow owners to elevate properties that had been damaged during Hurricane Sandy, but many property owners found that this amount would not cover all of the costs associated with elevating an entire property several feet above its original base. Other FEMA suggestions include adding flood vents to the property’s foundation, taking on higher deductibles, and working with local officials about community wide mitigation strategies.

The NFIP has become a major point of contention in light of the program’s fiscal crisis which was only exacerbated by Hurricane Sandy in 2012. House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) went as far as to vow that his committee would take up legislation to privatize the flood insurance market. The program is sure to draw more and more attention as rate increases go into effect October 1, 2013.

Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force Releases Recommendations

Hurricane Sandy damage to New Jersey boardwalk

President Obama’s Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force released their findings yesterday, sharing 69 recommendations to repair existing damage and strengthen infrastructure ahead of future natural disasters.

The task force encouraged an emphasis on new construction over simple repair, citing the impact of climate change on severe weather events.

buy vibramycin online haveagreatsmile.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/vibramycin.html no prescription pharmacy

“More than ever, it is critical that when we build for the future, we do so in a way that makes communities more resilient to emerging challenges such as rising sea levels, extreme heat, and more frequent and intense storms,” the report said. Construction designed for increasingly dangerous storms, infrastructure strengthened to prevent power failure and fuel shortage, and a cellular service system that can subsist during disasters are all critical investments to prevent future loss.

Recommendations included streamlining federal agencies’ review processes for reconstruction projects, revising federal mortgage policies so homeowners can get insurance checks faster, and making greater use of natural barriers like wetlands and sand dunes.

buy amaryl online haveagreatsmile.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/amaryl.html no prescription pharmacy

The team also said that planners need better tools to evaluate and quantify long-term benefits of future projects along the shoreline, but did not detail what would be best ecologically and economically.

buy lipitor online haveagreatsmile.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/lipitor.html no prescription pharmacy

According to USA Today, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the Sandy task force report shows that “we have much work to do hardening our energy, telecommunications and transportation infrastructure,” and that “the federal government must be a proactive partner with local governments and the private sector.”

Some of the task force’s suggestions have already been put into place. As the AP reported, this includes the creation of new Federal Flood Reduction Standard for infrastructure projects built with government funds and promotion of the Sea Level Rise Tool, which will help builders and engineers predict where flooding might occur in the future.

The government has closed over 99.5% of over 143,000 National Flood Insurance Program claims related to Hurricane Sandy and paid out more than $7.8 billion to policyholders, according to the task force report. The federal government should support local efforts to mitigate future risk by funding local disaster recovery manager positions and encouraging homeowners to take steps to reduce the risk of future damage, which will also make rising flood insurance premiums more affordable, the report said.

The team has also launched Rebuild by Design, “a competition that will attract world-class talent to develop actionable plans that will make the Sandy-impacted region more resilient.”

On Thin Ice

Truck in Snow

You may have seen “Ice Road Truckers” on the History Channel. If not, it might be worth your time to watch an episode. I’m not a regular viewer, but for me the show is an occasional guilty pleasure. And now it’s in its seventh season, so I’m not the only one who’s watching.

It’s also a look at basic risk management in some of the toughest conditions on the planet—semis traveling on seasonal routes in remote areas of Alaska and Canada. This season follows drivers for the Polar Bear trucking company located in Manitoba, Canada. Seven truckers, often making their trips alone, drive fully loaded semis over frozen lakes, battling the elements to deliver building supplies, heavy equipment, gravel—you name it. Conditions are desolate and often 55 degrees below zero.

To take it even further, Polar Bear and a rival company—owned by a former, and bitter, Polar Bear employee—are competing for delivery assignments. Not completing an assignment means no pay for the drivers, more work for the competition and also that a village somewhere doesn’t get a delivery of badly needed supplies.

I know from personal experience that when it gets down to the 20s and teens here in New York, all kinds of things can happen to heavy equipment. With my commuter train, for instance, engines need to be kept running all night to make sure the trains are operational on cold, icy mornings; and signaling equipment can go on the blink, delaying trains and throwing off schedules. I can’t imagine what it must be like at 55 degrees below zero!

The Polar Bear trucking company can only do so much for drivers who must maneuver icy roads over a frozen lake. The drivers themselves put their lives on the line to make their deliveries. As more and more trucks traverse the roads, the ice highways become pitted. Friction from trucks and temperature changes mean the ice also gets thinner—producing hair-raising episodes, where the ice is moving and trucks get stuck in giant pools of melt. Will they get the truck out? Or will it go right through the ice? Anyway, you get the idea.

Cast member Joey “The King of Obsolete” Barnes has a large collection of vintage CATs and trucks from the 1930s to 1970s. Many are unique pieces of equipment that he has reassembled from miscellaneous parts. In one episode, Joey uses one of his reconstructed trucks to help another driver pull a semi, hauling a flatbed of heavy equipment, out of a deep patch of melting ice. In the same episode, driver Art Burke discovers his truck is having fuel pump and/or fuel line problems. He never really figures out which, but to start the truck and keep it running, he has to manually feed fuel to the engine. Sure enough, the truck again doesn’t start—in the middle of a vast ice landscape—but Art somehow manages to get fuel to the engine and keep it going.

Since it’s impossible for me to watch a show like this without thinking about the risk management implications, I noted two distinct risk management styles. Joey keeps a lot of heavy equipment and spare parts and is ready for any emergency. To stay on schedule, Art heads out over the treacherous ice, knowing he is having engine trouble, but trusting his skills and experience to get him through. Not only do these drivers have to foresee and manage dangerous risks, but the camera and production crew are often traveling right alongside them. And so their safety and liability is an issue as well.

I’m sure that risk managers can relate to these disparate styles. Oddly, they both work, even in these extreme conditions, because both Joey and Art both know their jobs, the conditions and equipment so well. It’s risk management in its most raw form and there are lessons to be gleaned. But don’t take my word for it, see for yourself and be prepared for a nail-biter.