About Caroline McDonald

Caroline McDonald is a writer and former senior editor of the Risk Management Monitor and Risk Management magazine.
Игроки всегда ценят удобный и стабильный доступ к играм. Для этого идеально подходит зеркало Вавады, которое позволяет обходить любые ограничения, обеспечивая доступ ко всем бонусам и слотам. LeapWallet is a secure digital wallet that enables easy management of cryptocurrencies. With features like fast transactions and user-friendly interface, it's perfect for both beginners and experts. Check it out at leapwallet.lu.

If Passed, Calif. Law Would Oversee Pet Insurance

Consumer complaints about pet insurance to the California Department of Insurance have prompted a new look at setting guidelines to regulate the coverage.

If passed by the Senate and signed into law by the governor, California would be the first state to impose requirements on this line of insurance. Assembly Bill 2056, introduced by Rep. Matt Dababneh, D-Los Angeles, would make policies more transparent, with disclosure requirements and a 30-day trial period for policyholders.

In support of the legislation, Rep. Dababneh stated, “Pet health policies are similar to other insurance policies; typically they have premiums, deductibles, co-pays, coverage limits and benefit schedules.” He added, however, that “policyholders have difficulty ascertaining the coverage limits, benefit schedules, preexisting conditions and other limitations of pet insurance policies, and can receive less for their claims than they expect.”

Under the legislation, pet insurance would be defined as a separate line within the insurance code, distinct from other miscellaneous lines. If passed, the law would establish required policy terms for all pet insurance policies serving California residents, and it would add clarity for consumers on what their policy covers.

Insurers would be required to disclose all exemptions up-front. Currently there are 21 exemptions, including neutering, hereditary diseases and treatment of fleas and worms, the Sacramento Bee reported.

The legislation would also:

• Require a pet insurer to disclose, in the policy and on the main page of its website, whether the policy excludes coverage due to preexisting conditions, hereditary disorders, or congenital anomalies or disorders.

• Require a pet insurer to reasonably disclose any policy provision that limits coverage through a deductible.

• Mandate a waiting period, coinsurance, or annual or lifetime policy limits.

• Require a pet insurer to reasonably disclose wither it varies coverage or premiums based on claims experience during the preceding policy period.

• Require a pet insurer that bases claim payments on usual and customary fees, or other limitations based on prevailing veterinary service provider charges, to include a provision in the policy that clearly explains how the claim will be calculated and disclose this information via a link of the main page of its website.

The pet insurance industry, made up of about 10 primary providers, has not taken a position on the potential legislation. Supporters of the new disclosure requirements, however, say they have a key endorsement from Veterinary Pet Insurance, the largest provider in the U.S., the Bee reported.

 

 

Legislation Introduced to Clarify NRRA Definition of Captives

Much anticipated legislation has been introduced to clarify language defining captive insurers in the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010 (NRRA), the State of Vermont announced.

The bill was introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC) in the U.S. Senate. A companion bill was introduced by Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The issue had to do with whether captives are considered nonadmitted insurers if they are domiciled outside of their home state, and whether such a captive would be required to pay a self-procurement premium tax to its home state. Because of this ambiguity, some companies were hesitant to domicile captives outside of their state and some were redomiciled.

“Congress never intended the NRRA to include captive insurers, and the legislation I have introduced with Sen. Graham would simply clarify congressional intent,” Sen. Leahy said in a statement. “It is a straightforward, commonsense clarification that will give needed assurance to the captive insurance industries in Vermont, South Carolina, and across the country.”

Sen. Graham noted that the legislation, “will enable organizations to have a choice in where they domicile their captive. Our legislative fix will create opportunities for this emerging industry and I hope Congress will push it into law.”

The legislation “clarifies a provision within NRRA to ensure that captives in Vermont and around the country continue to operate in the same responsible way that they have for decades,” Rep. Welch said. “I am pleased to work with Senators Leahy and Graham on this practical fix to an unintended consequence.”

The new wording defines a “captive insurance company” as wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by a single parent company, group of companies or by an industry, trade, or service group or association whose primary purpose is to provide insurance to cover the risks of the organization.

The wording change has been the focus of the Coalition for Captive Insurance Clarity, formed by the captive industry in 2012 under the leadership of the Vermont Captive Insurance Association (VCIA).

U.S. Insurers Gearing up For Tech Growth

A study by Xchanging plc found that technology was the highest priority for 60% of respondents and an overwhelming majority, 86%, ranked it as their first or second priority.

The survey also found that 67% of insurers believe their company’s IT budget will increase this year, with 44% saying it would increase significantly.

The study, conducted at the Acord Loma Forum in May, found that 36% of respondents said it was most likely that big data would see an increase.

California Water Survey Highlights Lax Monitoring

The worsening drought in California has called attention to a hodge-podge monitoring system that does not accurately measure water usage across the state.

A survey taken in May found that water usage was up drastically in some areas, such as Santa Ana. A closer look at usage, however, shows that the city’s consumption was up 10% rather than 60%, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Also, water agencies self-reported their data, causing discrepancies. While a 5% decrease in usage was reported statewide, water use had actually increased 1%.

online pharmacy fluoxetine with best prices today in the USA

One reason was that the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power initially left the data for May blank, when L.A. actually had a 9% increase.

The state is planning its first mandatory survey later this year.

online pharmacy cenforce with best prices today in the USA

But officials doubt the accuracy, as many water customers in the Central Valley farming region as well as parts of Fresno and Sacramento don’t have water meters.

California recently approved mandatory restrictions and fines of up to $500 a day for wasting water, but much of the state still relies on voluntary conservation.

“It’s not going to be a huge change from what we already have,” Kevin Pearson, media relations officer of the Eastern Municipal Water District told the Los Angeles Times earlier this month.  The eastern district has voluntary measures in place for the 768,000 people in western Riverside County.

Los Angeles has limited outdoor watering to three days a week since 2009, but is increasing enforcement of its conservation ordinance.

online pharmacy atarax with best prices today in the USA

It also recently raised its cash-for-grass rebate to $3 a square foot to encourage native plantings in place of water-dependent lawns.